My story as a user started several years ago, when I decided to begin making proposals on the Near Pure Good Wiki, Near Pure Evil Wiki, Inconsistently Admirable Wiki and Inconsistently Heinous Wiki. You may see whom I proposed in my talkpages (I added this info there to evade confusion). But there appeared a situation when I broke some rules and got blacklisted on the Near Pure Good Wiki and the Inconsistently Admirable Wiki. The thing is I proposed everyone whom I wanted to and no longer had any candidates to propose. But I still wanted to propose someone, but was afraid that whom I call good candidates will be already proposed (or even gain a consensus) when I'll propose them, so I wanted to act on forward. But I didn't bother to check if the candidates I chose to match the criteria. And sometimes they blatantly didn't. And when a candidate doesn't meet the criteria, you can't make a good-quality proposal. My ones ended up low-quality. I should have understood that when my proposals got either rejected or removed by the admins. But sadly, I understood it only when I got blacklisted. Later I was blacklisted on the Magnificent Baddie Wiki for the very same reason. That's why I was suspended from whitelist on the Heroes Wiki and was also denied to be whitelisted on the Inconsistently Heinous Wiki. I decided to wait until a suitable moment to return. And this suitable moment came when Silly Pure Evils/Near Pure Evils were implemented. I made some proposals, which were mostly successful (unless you count Alameda Slim as a successfully proposed character, since he got removed sometime later). But I was blacklisted again. You might say "you are bad in learning from your mistakes", and of course, you'll be right. That's the cost of any spontaneous ideas. When you aren't well prepared to something, but your actions are successful, you'll have a syndrome of an achieved goal -- you won't know what to do next. That's what happened to me. Someone else in my situation would go, especially when other users go. But I won't. I'll wait until a suitable moment to return, but now, I'll be better-prepared. All my proposals in my sandboxes are as good-written as I find it possible and I recheck them constantly. I waited once, I will wait a second time. After all, I have unanswered questions. I don't insist into returning me in the whitelist from the black one, since from what I know, this isn't something that the admins like to do, but earlier or later I'll find a suitable moment to return. I hope it'll happen as soon as possible, but I'm patient and don't hurry.
What's on your mind?
TEXT
POLL
- All711 posts
- General710 posts
- Announcements1 post
Sort by
Card Layout
33 Votes in Poll
22 Votes in Poll
23 Votes in Poll
He definitely isn’t a heroic benchmark anymore
She has basically subverted all of her corrupting qualities and redeemed herself. She passes the baseline as she tried to make peace with hell to prevent war. However, she massively fails to basically everyone who helped stop the Might of Lilith blow and especially Emily
Just asking out of curiosity (Image Related)
Should thereof moved to either Standard Heroism or Near Pure Good due lack of standard comparison?
Just asking because i feel like there could be a few characters from that universe that qualify here
10 Votes in Poll
15 Votes in Poll
Should we add a Near Completely Good category for heroes neither completely good nor flawed embraced (e.g. Bagheera and Abu)? The standard good wiki has that category though I am not sure why. Someone should talk to the admins of the Standard Good wiki about that category.
Note: Please keep in mind that this photo is clearly based on the game Disney Lorcana and that’s the update I just want to be specific for the record being.
600 pages have been reached after the bog-standard heroic benchmark purge.
I think his page deserves a restoration, he literally sacrificed his own life to prevent Tramp from going to the Pound, and Trusty also played somewhat of a role in looking for Scamp, kind of like how King Triton is allowed to be here
He has no corrupting qualities. He 100% passes the baseline for being a father figure to Naruto and helping him become who he is.
However he massively fails the admirable standards to many other heroes as outside of what he does to pass the baseline, there's not much else he does that morally stands out in the series.
After all, this guy risked his life and successfully rescued 3 people which are Ian, Sarah and Nick with a car and a chain before dying because of the T-Rexes ripping him in half. He also doesn't seem to possess any corrupting factors.
He has a lot of indirect He has a lot of inflieunce, most notably in the 1st movie, leaving a big marking in a cave before he died, which was the password "Kronos" and was intentional, which is where Mr. Incredible comes in as he learns about the password "Kronos" that lead to Syndrome's plans, which makes Gazberbeam the important player to Syndrome's downfall, however despite passing the Baseline, his influence is too indirect to make him mire stand out and fails to Mr. Incredible and Elasticgirl in the Admirable Standards. What do you think?